policy

Policy


POST 1299


Click me

The insightful, prolific and clever singer-songwriter Jesse Welles has done it again: He’s told the truth. Listen to his song, There’s a Hole.

After you’ve heard it, remind yourself that we attacked Iran for no specific reason, fueled by no coherent strategy, we lusted after vague and wandering, inconsistent goals, all entirely without an exit plan. To be fair, there have been great clouds of presidential bluster. How could we have been suckered into that after 20 years in Iraq and Afghanistan?

This sounds suspiciously like our idiocy in Vietnam, the very place President Bone Spurs avoided with five fraudulent deferments.

A key difference between then and now is that there was a draft then and kids just out of school were being vacuumed into that Southeast Asia death machine, leading to constant protests in our streets. You know, demonstrations of “.  .  . the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” that’s guaranteed to us by the First Amendment. You remember that right, right? President Bone Spurs doesn’t.

The protests weren’t only about the killing and dying: they were also about the stupidity.

There was no specific reason for that war except for the inane, hyper-righty “domino theory,” which history has proven to be bunk. It was the “mushroom cloud” scare tactic of the day. There was no coherent strategy, the goals were vague and inconsistent and the entire thing lacked even a hint of an exit plan. Nobody wanted to kill or be killed for hollow, vaporous reasons; hence, people opposed the war and the draft.

Now there is no draft, so there are no student protests. Instead, government appeals to the patriotism and manliness of our young. Instead of forcing them into the death machine, now we trick them into it with puffery and slick slogans (“Be all that you can be.”) and signing bonuses that poor kids can’t refuse.

Click me

To extend the comparison still further, there quite obviously was no way to win the Vietnam war, so a proposed street solution was for us to declare victory and go home. Richard Nixon couldn’t abide that solution, declaring that he wasn’t going to be the first American president to lose a war. He really did think it was all about himself and his legacy, body counts be damned. That’s Trump’s policy, too.

Nixon managed to avoid signing his name on that imaginary surrender document by quitting the job and dumping the whole mess onto Gerald Ford. That led to the embarrassment of helicopters under fire evacuating our diplomatic personnel from the roof of our embassy in Saigon, now renamed Ho Chi Minh City.

Click me

Arguably, the signatures of Ford, Nixon, Johnson, Kennedy, Eisenhower and Truman belong on that imaginary surrender document. Bear in mind that our involvement in Vietnam began by bailing out President Charles de Gaulle of France, a country stripped of its military might due to WW II. We covered for him so that he could keep his colony, then part of what was called French Indochina.

Isn’t it interesting that the combatants in that war consisted of those wanting to remain colonials – the South Vietnamese – versus the people fighting for their liberty, for an independent nation, the North Vietnamese. How did we descendants of American revolutionaries who fought against colonialism get on the wrong side of that fight? Oh, right, de Gaulle had been an ally in WW II.

Now we are, by choice and by self-destructiveness, an ally of no one and we are once again fighting an unwinnable war. We haven’t a ghost of an exit plan and we have proudly learned no lessons that we should have learned from  20 years in Vietnam and re-learned from 20 years of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Because Trump is incapable of admitting he made a mistake, the list of American dead and wounded in Iran will climb higher and higher. More on that in a moment.

Separately, we have now blown up 67 small boats in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific Ocean, killing 221 people. There continues to be no evidence of drugs on those boats and the cocaine supply in the U.S. hasn’t slowed. That’s likely because none of those boats was headed for the U.S. The drugs come to our shores via other paths. Still, Trump wantonly murdered those boat people for no reason other than his need to demonstrate how tough he is. Our government called our murderous actions legal. That’s policy.

The men on those boats were South Americans and they likely had brown skin, so there’s no reason for our empathy deficient, racist government geniuses to care about them, any more than they care about non-Christians in Iran. Bear in mind that had they lived, those 168 little girls we blew up in that Tehran school five months ago would have grown up and probably given birth to more non-Christians. That’s plenty of reason for our racist Trump government to refuse to even apologize for murdering them.

This is what passes for our national defense policy. It satisfies our mental incompetents in government and is good business strategy for their buddies, the war matériel contractors.

Once again, Trump is incapable of admitting he made a mistake, like killing those little girls, so this Iran bloodbath will continue at least until he’s out of office. Come to think of it, that’s a lot like the Vietnam war that killed over 58,000 of our military people and millions of Vietnamese. But the Vietnamese were Asians and were nothing more than body counts to our government.

Perhaps the 25th Amendment will be invoked and forced upon our dementia addled president. The ugly prospect of surrender in Iran will then be left to a hapless J.D. Vance. There will be no word dance left for him to do and Trump will have skated from accountability yet again. That’s our policy.

Until then this illegal, intractable Iran war is an effective public distraction from Trump’s Epstein adventures in pedophilia. That’s policy, too.

Quote of the Week
  • “We should confiscate the billions Trump made in crypto and distribute it to Epstein survivors.”
  • Andy Borowitz

The time for action is NOW!
Keep standing up,
speaking out
and taking action

Did someone forward this post to you? Welcome! Please subscribe – use the simple form above on the right. And pass this along to three others, encouraging them to subscribe (IT’S A FREEBIE!), because it’s going to take ALL OF US to get the job done.

And add your comments below to help us all to be better informed.

The Fine Print:

  1. Writings quoted or linked from my posts reflect a point I want to make, at least in part. That does not necessarily mean that I endorse or agree with everything in such writings.
  2. There are lots of smart, well-informed people. Sometimes we agree; sometimes we don’t. Search for others’ views and decide for yourself.
  3. Errors in fact, grammar, spelling and punctuation are all embarrassingly mine, but I do wish that I could blame someone else. Glad to have your corrections.
  4. I am neither offered nor do I accept funding of any type from candidates, online blabbers, organizations with or without any position or opinion or from any other origin other than from my own meager resources.
  5. Book links to Amazon or Barnes & Noble are provided for reference only. Please purchase your books through your local mom & pop bookstore. Keep them and your town or neighborhood vibrant.
  6. Clicking on most pics in these posts will take you to the source material.
  7. Do not look to these posts for “both sides” idiocy. I don’t have life to waste on such foolishness, such disingenuous nonsense and you shouldn’t either. You can find “both sides” misdirection in any cowardly publication. I post what I believe to be true, sarcasm and snark sometimes excepted. I make no pretense nor allow any space for the idiocy of insisting views to be somehow balanced for reporting or opinion presentation fairness, because doing so would be grossly unfair and of no value.
  8. If you disagree with anything I write, if you think I’m inappropriately biased, puff up your courage and put it in the Comments section. But see Point #9 below. On the other hand, let’s agree that I, like you, am biased.
  9. Comments offered by readers, whether in agreement with my opinions or opposing, are encouraged and greatly appreciated. All comments are reviewed prior to going live. I reserve the right to edit for readability, punctuation, typos, voluntary idiocy and to exclude those comments I deem inappropriate or offensive solely for someone taking the opportunity to be offensive. It’s my post, my rules.
  10. We do not sell, give away, lend, share or otherwise allow the disclosure of the identity of our subscribers or of their information. Never have, never will. That should not have to be said, but the times have taught us that the words do need to be declared. At the last, all we can cling to is trust in one another.
  11. Responsibility for the content of these posts is unequivocally, totally, unavoidably mine. Unless it’s a guest essay, in which case, blame the guest.

Click me

JA


Copyright 2026 by Jack Altschuler
Reproduction and sharing are encouraged, providing proper attribution is given.

I Really Need Your Help With This


Reading time – 3:49  .  .  .

My pal John Calia (find him here) describes himself as a libertarian. Because I’m a progressive we have lots to talk about and frequently do so. Last week we had an email exchange that eventually reached the shoulder shrug point because even together we were unable to find much in the way of solid answers.

This series of exchanges was sparked by an essay in The New York Times that took a look at what it is that causes voters the most heartburn about Donald Trump. Public polling shows that his persona, separate from his policies, is a huge source of angst.

Okay, nothing new there, as this issue deftly crosses our political divide. But the comparison itself set me to asking the key question: What are Trump’s policies? Let’s start with an historical benchmark.

During the Cold War the foreign policy of all presidents included Soviet/communist containment, and the expansion of democracy. With hindsight we can pick apart the successes & failures and the value of those policies and the strategies that supported them, but the intent was always clear. Agree or disagree with it, that’s what policy looks like.

As I crafted my list of Trump policies it quickly became clear that what I was able to name was a list of Trump actions. What wasn’t clear was any identifiable policy behind them. Here are some examples.

Two of the first things Trump did upon assuming office was to pull us out of both the Paris Climate Accord and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Those are not policies; they are actions. What is the foreign policy those actions support? What is his policy on climate warming?

He took us out of the JCPOA – the Iran deal. Iran was in full compliance with the agreement at the time. After Trump took the U.S. out of the deal, Iran promptly restarted its uranium enrichment program, exactly what the JCPOA had stopped. Since then he has levied new sanctions, has pressured allies to institute snap-back sanctions and talked very tough against Iran. Again, these are all actions, but I’m hard pressed to identify the policy they serve.

He boasted he would “drain the swamp,” but has installed mostly swamp creatures in his Cabinet; i.e., industry moguls, insiders and lobbyists in charge of their own industry. What’s the policy?

He talks tough about law and order and has sent federal troops to attack protesters in, for example, Portland, OR. But apparently the protests and white supremacist violence in Charlottesville were okay – no troops were sent there. Plus he praised the 17 year old vigilante who killed 2 protesters and injured a third in Kenosha. What is his law and order policy?

He has dramatically reduced legal immigration but used 5 immigrants as props in a new citizenship ceremony on the second night of the RNC show and did so without their consent. In speaking about immigration he has excoriated “sh#t-hole” countries and called for more immigration from Norway. What is his policy on immigration?

He has tried multiple times to ban all Muslims from entering the country. What is his policy on freedom of religion?

His actions regarding China are schizophrenic. What is his China policy?

He gave Kim Jong-un international standing by meeting with him and then claimed a great victory for the U.S., saying he had negotiated the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula. Regardless, there has been no change in North Korea’s behavior, nor a disposal of its nuclear arsenal or its missiles, despite Trump’s claim the he and Kim “fell in love.” What is Trump’s policy regarding North Korea?

Roughly 80% of terrorist acts in the U.S. are done by white supremacists. Trump never addresses that, but does rail about MS-13, ISIS and Muslim/Islamist terrorists. What is his policy regarding terrorism in the U.S.?

Trump is once again challenging the Affordable Care Act (“Obamacare”) in order to eliminate it. He promised during the 2016 campaign and afterward that he would replace it with a program that is both farther reaching and less expensive, yet four years later has literally nothing to offer in the way of a replacement. What is his healthcare policy? To be fair, in all 10 years since 2010 when the act was passed the Republicans chanted and promised “remove and replace,” yet never offered any replacement, so it appears their policy on healthcare was limited to “Repeal Obamacare.” That isn’t a policy; it’s just an action that is absent of justification.

I truly cannot answer my own questions and my pal John is pretty well challenged to name policy, too.

As I made my list I tried valiantly to avoid judgment and snark and must confess I didn’t do well with that.  Nevertheless, I continue to want clarity about policy. Not presidential flamboyant statements, not tough guy posturing, but actual national policy, so I turn to you.

Please post your notions in the Comments section about any Trump policy that seems clear to you. I’m after coherent statements, something that might be on a screen at the front of the Situation Room and on a flip chart in the Oval Office to keep everyone clear and focused.

What are Trump’s national policies?

—————————

Speaking of policy, if Joe Biden wins he’ll be wise to follow some of the FDR policy advice as explained in a recent David Brooks piece. The loud voices on the left want a revolution, but most Americans want something that goes down a bit easier.

—————————————-

Ed. note: We need to spread the word so that we make a critical difference, so

  1. Pass this along to three people, encouraging them to subscribe (IT’S A FREEBIE!).
  2. Engage in the Comments section below to help us all to be better informed.

Thanks!

The Fine Print:

  1. Writings quoted or linked from my posts reflect a point I want to make, at least in part. That does not mean that I endorse or agree with everything in such writings, so don’t bug me about it.
  2. Sometimes I change my opinions because I’ve learned more about an issue. So, educate me. That’s what the Comments section is for.
  3. Errors in fact, grammar, spelling and punctuation are all embarrassingly mine. Glad to have your corrections.
  4. Responsibility for the content of these posts is unequivocally, totally, unavoidably mine.

JA

 


Copyright 2026 by Jack Altschuler
Reproduction and sharing are encouraged, providing proper attribution is given.

 Scroll to top