WWPReading time – 88 seconds; Viewing time – 3:36

One of the most difficult things to deal with is betrayal. It is the very thing that is driving the popular success of the Donald Trump f#&k you campaign. People feel sold out – betrayed – by our government and they are livid and they gravitate to a candidate spewing outrage. That sense of betrayal – the stab in the back by those we trusted – is part of the reason why treason is a capital crime.

And it is exactly why I have a problem with the Wounded Warrior Project. I’ve always had an unease about the slick commercials that show wounded vets in rehab, families with a disabled parent and they’re all smiling, a popular country singer tugging at hearts in a practiced baritone voice and a sound track that begs that we say a prayer for peace. The commercials are slick, because nowhere in the ads is there a statement about services actually delivered to vets and the benefits vets get and the recoveries they experience due to Wounded Warrior Project services, so the ads don’t quite pass the sniff test. What is really going on?

In a stunning January 27, 2016 article in the New York Times online, Dave Phillips detailed the lavish spending – hundreds of millions of dollars per year – that Wounded Warrior Project spends on its executives, not vets, for travel, dinners and hotels, its draconian employee practices and other questionable activities of the organization.

Wounded Warrior Project urges us to donate $19 per month and they give a WWP blanket as a token of thanks. That would be nice, were the monthly ding on your credit card account actually going to helping our vets. Phillips reports that, “About 40% of the organization’s donations in 2014 were spent on its overhead  .  .  . which includes administrative expenses and marketing costs  .  .  .” That means that $7.60 of every $19 monthly donation goes to executive pay and fancy hotels at $500 per night, instead of helping wounded veterans. To put that into perspective, ”  .  .  .  the Semper Fi Fund, a wounded-veterans group .  .  .  spent about 8 percent of donations on overhead.”

Ugly fact: Phillips reports that Mr. Nardizzi, CEO of Wounded Warrior Project, ”  .  .  .  was given $473,000 in compensation in 2014.” Is it okay with you that all that money went to a very healthy, never-been-in-the-military CEO instead of going to vets suffering PTSD or amputations? If you have donated to Wounded Warrior Project, are you now feeling duped?

We hold our veterans in highest esteem, as they do for us what we don’t want to do ourselves. They intentionally put themselves in harms way to protect us and they too often need our help when they come home. I’m all for supporting our veterans and I’m definitely not for supporting Mr. Nardizzi, who probably won’t be sending me a Wounded Warrior Project blanket any time soon. And that’s okay, because I think he is betraying our veterans.

CBS reported on this issue, too, and if you’d like to read the weasel words Wounded Warrior Project had to say in response, click here. Perhaps the reporting is wrong. Maybe they spend 20% on overhead, as Nardizzi claims in his rebuttal. But 8% is even better – and there’s still that sniff thing.


Ed. note: There is much in America that needs fixing and we are on a path to continually fail to make things better. It is my goal to make a difference – perhaps to be a catalyst for things to get better. That is the reason for these posts. To accomplish the goal requires reaching many thousands of people and a robust dialogue.

ACTION STEP: Please offer your comments below and pass this along to three people, encouraging them to subscribe.  Thanks!  JA

Copyright 2024 by Jack Altschuler
Reproduction and sharing are encouraged, providing proper attribution is given.

What do you think?

Your name and e-mail address are required, but your e-mail will not be disclosed.

Keep the conversation going by both adding your comments and by passing this along to three friends.
That´s how things get better.

4 Responses to Betrayal
  1. Allan Shuman Reply

    Regarding the reports and WWP’s responses, the responses have enough fudging to call their legitimacy into question, but enough hard numbers to merit further investigation.

  2. Jim Altschuler Reply

    Well said, Jack. And Frank, thank you for back-checking the facts behind the myth.

    Yes, WWP sounds in their slick ads like a terrific organization to support but, in fact, they are like so many other “charitable” organizations that squander major portions of the funds the receive on extravagances including bloated salaries and expense accounts.

    Again, thanks Jack and Frank.

  3. Frank Levy Reply

    For all the reasons you mention in your blog, the NY Times article confirmed what I have always suspected about the WWP. A couple of years back my son-in-law, a Navy vet, wanted to donate to WWP. As someone who works in the non-profit world I went to Charity Navigator and Guidestar to check them out. Their filings, including their IRS 990 looked fishy to me and I told him to find another veterans charity to give his money to.

    But the bigger betrayal is the current US Congress. These jerks have no problem sending young men and women to fight in made up wars to help inflate the bank accounts of their military industrial complex supporters. They are all too quick to send American men and women to fight in made up religious wars so they can instill fear in Americans and win elections. But, these as@#$les can’t see fit to fund needed medical and mental health services for veterans they sent to their made up wars, and their families. Here is a link to a list of bills the Republican, war-monger Congress failed to pass that would have made the lives of veterans and their families better.

  4. Marilyn Curren Reply

    Recently there was a death in my family. It was requested that we donate to the Wounded Warriors Project. Something made me hold off. Think it was the slick ads. Glad I did.