The Endarkened Right

Endarkened RightReading time – 54 seconds  .  .  .

This is just too strange – read through to the end and you’ll see why.

And, yes, I know that “endarkened” isn’t a word. For now, though, let it stand as the polar opposite of “enlightened.” And let “right” mean not “correct,” but the stupidly polar opposite of stupidly polar “left.”

On May 11 Charles Murray’s essay was published in the Wall Street Journal and is entitled, Regulation Run Amok-And How to Fight Back. His contention is that there are just gobs of government regulations that are strangling the America out of America. Indeed, he tells us in what he appears to believe are self-evident terms,

“Then, with FDR’s New Deal and the rise of the modern regulatory state, our founding principle was subordinated to other priorities and agendas. What made America unique first blurred, then faded and today is almost gone.”

Gosh, that sounds as though instead of melting the Wicked Witch of the East, we liquidated Glinda, the bubble-traveling Good Witch of the North – on purpose. Note, too, how he invokes “the modern regulatory state,” as though it is some agreed upon, fact-worthy construction, like ancient Athens as a city-state. It isn’t.

Murray goes through a litany of innuendo and shadow puppet notions to support his case and then tells us what we good Americans should do about all those terrible regulations: we should just ignore them. Civil disobedience. Do what makes sense to you, even if you break the law, he tells us.

No cars have come down your street for over five hours and it’s 3:30AM. Why in the world should you have to stop at that stop sign? Just blast on through the intersection.

You own the land, so you should be able to do what you damn well please with it. Those regulators can’t tell you what to do, by golly, so you build your boutique toxic chemical plant in your garage and if the stuff sometimes spills and runs down the driveway toward the sidewalk where the little kids are walking to school, no biggie.

Let ’em come after you, because you have your good sense to protect you against those annoying experts the regulators will call as witnesses when your delusional ass is hauled into court. But you’ll be okay financially, because Murray also proposes a Legal Services Corporation (his words) as a kind of people’s insurance against those pesky regulators who strangely think they are supposed to uphold the law.

Look, nobody thinks that we don’t have some stupid regulations and that some have long outlived their usefulness and may now be nothing more than foolish obstacles. But the way to correct those is not to create a nation of chaos-inducing vigilantes pretending that they know better than anyone else. It’s to change the law. Isn’t that what righties say when civil rights activists push the limits?

Can you believe it? As a left-of-center moderate, I’m giving “obey the law” instruction to an endarkened righty. Surely, we are living in strange times.


Ed. note: There is much in America that needs fixing and we are on a path to continually fail to make things better. It is my goal to make a difference – perhaps to be a catalyst for things to get better. That is the reason for these posts. To accomplish the goal requires reaching many thousands of people and a robust dialogue.

ACTION STEP: Please offer your comments below and pass this along to three people, encouraging them to subscribe.  Thanks!  JA

Copyright 2024 by Jack Altschuler
Reproduction and sharing are encouraged, providing proper attribution is given.

What do you think?

Your name and e-mail address are required, but your e-mail will not be disclosed.

Keep the conversation going by both adding your comments and by passing this along to three friends.
That´s how things get better.

3 Responses to The Endarkened Right
  1. dominick palella Reply

    Individuals complaining about “regulations” seem to be those paid to write about them in business and corporate funded organizations. Their main objections to regulations appear to center on those that seem to affect corporate profits. They ignore the fact that regulations usually protect the public from the health, safety and financial fraud perpetuated in the pursuit of profit by business enterprises.

    If anyone were to ask a politician why they refer to regulations as somehow bad for the public interest, just try asking a few questions like these: “Would you prefer fewer regulations, and more rat turds in your hotdogs.” “Would you prefer ACA insurance companies take 50% of your premiums to pay for their administrative costs and executive compensation, instead of a mere 20%? “Would you be happier if all banks continue to pay you less than 1% interest on your savings account, and maybe charge 50% interest on your credit cards, instead of only 25%?” “Are you unhappy making $20 an hour in a unionized work place, and prefer to work for whatever you can get – without any minimum wage?”

    You’ll note that the “too many regulations” corporate shills don’t bring up exactly what regulations they don’t want. However, it appears that the bonehead you describe in the article doesn’t have enough sense to recognize his own stupidity. On the other hand, maybe he is smart – and seeking a future job in the Trump administration!

    • JaxPolitix Reply

      Strong arguments, Dominick. I especially like your closing shot.

    • JaxPolitix Reply

      Strong arguments, Dominick. I especially like your closing shot!